welcher prozi es gibt sooooviiillll ? und wo ist der unterschied Clawhammer Newcastle Winchester Venice San Diego Sledgehammer
hallo an alle erst mal. nun möchte ich mir einen neuen rechner zulegen als board werde ich MB-S939 NVNF4SLI Gigabyte K8N-Ultra-SLI ATX nehmen + HDS 250GB Samsung P120 250/7200/8 SATA2-NCQ (SP2504C)
aber jetzt die frage welcher prozi ? es gibt ja so viele sorten oder kerne.
gelöscht_15325 
Hardcore1 „Wenn ihr meint!Ich meine genau das gegenteil:Mit meinen 2x256 @2-5-2-2-1T ziehe...“
Oh Mann! Du hast sowas von Unrecht! ;-)
Zitat1
Saying that though, I played BF2:MC for the first time last night, and it is a slow pig. Loading times are crazy and I am going to try 2Gb of RAM to try to reduce loading times.
Also, when buying RAM, cheap RAM (CL3) is fine unless you are running dual channel mode with Pentium 4 CPUs (old NForce too?), then this can be a bit of a lottery. Expensive RAM (CL2 & CL2.5) have been shown in benchmarks to give upto a 2% boost to overall CPU performance in memory intensive applications. BF2:MC is not a CPU limited game for most people, so this pathetic 2% doesn't even help your frame rates. Buy cheap RAM and save your money for the video card, unless you want to aggressively overclock the RAM of course.
Zitat2
Two gigs of 3-4-4-8 memory will run BF2 noticeably better than one gig of 2-2-2-5 memory.
Zitat3
Since ive heard a lot of debate about whether or not BF2 will use more than 1GB of memory, i plan to do some extensive testing with 1 and 2GB at various settings and resolutions to show real world performance differences between the 2.
All tests done on a 64 player server with at least 60 players in game
1024x768 4xSSAA max AF, all settings high.
1GB: Avg: 43 - Min: 0 - Max: 79
2GB: Avg: 77 - Min: 35 - Max: 99
Overall gameplay - 1GB was hitching terribly thorought the entire round, the only way i could keep things smooth was to stay in the same area all the time, travelling anywhere else on the map caused recaching that made it run like total ass, caused at least 4 of my deaths. 2GB ran much better, obviously much more playable frams for competitve FPS play.
Memory usage at the end of round: 1136MB memory, 1120MB pagefile @ 1024x768 4xAA all settings high.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1600x1200 4xSSAA max AF, all settings high
1GB: Unplayable, hitching too bad. 0-36fps Round quit early.
2GB: Avg: 31 - Min: 17 - Max: 36
Overall gameplay - 1GB was unplayable. 2GB was playable but noticibly choppy, still far and away better than the hitching.
Memory usage at the end of round: N/A (quit)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Conclusions:
1. The task manager is not properly reporting memory usage. (win2k)
2. Battlefield 2 does utilize more than 1GB of memory.
3. At current ram prices, 2GB for this and future games is a no brainer.
4. The game overall improves with the memory upgrade, including moving through menus and load times.
Other notes:
Load times:
@ 1024 i saw a ~60% decrease in load times, they went from 61 seconds to 25 seconds from the memory upgrade alone.
